🔗 Share this article

Australia's bold move to prohibit social networking access for young people below 16 is sending ripples internationally. Politicians, safety advocates, and guardians are watching with great interest to see if this tactic will set a precedent for other nations.

European Momentum

Throughout Europe, a growing number of countries are exploring comparable measures.

• Denmark has stated a prohibition on social media for children under fifteen, with the leader arguing that phones and networks are "taking away our children's childhood". A law could be enacted next year.
• Norway is preparing to enforce a age restriction of 15, highlighting the need to safeguard children from the "manipulative force of the algorithms".
• Ireland is introducing a online verification tool to confirm the user details of social media account holders. Officials have suggested that an similar ban remains "an measures under consideration".
• In Spain, the prime minister has called on the legislature to enact a proposal lifting the legal age for using social media to 16.
• In France, the leader has proposed a ban for those under fifteen, and a parliamentary commission has recommended a similar move, including an overnight "digital curfew" for adolescents.
• The authorities in The Netherlands has urged guardians to block their children from social media up to the age of 15.

Across the European Union, the European parliament has adopted a non-binding motion calling for a ban for minors except if parental consent is granted. Although it cautions of the "habit-forming" nature of these platforms, the step does not create mandatory rules.

"A strong age restriction is a useful foundation," said a leading European lawmaker supporting the initiative.

The United Kingdom: A Watchful Stance

For the United Kingdom, the administration has kept open a future ban, emphasizing that "no option is off the table" but stressing any policy must be "supported by robust evidence".

Previously, support grew behind a legislative effort to enact limits on social media use by under-16s, but it was in the end watered down. Instead, the administration committed to further research the topic.

Charities have voiced apprehensions. One foundation established by the family of a girl who took her own life after being exposed to disturbing platform posts contends that a strict age ban could fail to improve online safety and could create a "cliff edge" of harm when teens turn 16.

"This ban is a reaction to the failure of the Silicon Valley to build tools that are safe and age appropriate for children," stated a leading peer.

The United States: A Decentralized Landscape

Across America, action is primarily occurring at the local level against a backdrop of federal inaction.

• Utah requires guardian permission for under-18s to use social media and restricts late-night use.
• The state of Florida has enacted a measure prohibiting children under fourteen from joining social media, though it is entangled in court battles.
• Virginia has passed a law limiting minors to a single hour of social media time per day, with any further use dependent on a guardian's okay.
• The state of Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have similarly passed bills demanding guardian approval for under-16s to set up social media presences.

Despite bipartisan support and suggestions from some individuals to follow this example, a nationwide ban is right now seen as unlikely.

Worldwide Views

Beyond these regions, additional countries are similarly considering moves.

• Malaysia intends to ban social media for under-16s effective next year.
• Brazil has lifted the access age for one major platform to 16.

Yet, global bodies adopt a more nuanced tone. A major UN agency has advised that age-based restrictions pose dangers and "might prove counterproductive". The body points out that the internet can be a "lifeline" for isolated children and that government action should not be a "substitute" for tech companies to prioritize child safeguards.

Even as this global conversation continues, the policies of this nation and others demonstrate that governments internationally are increasingly content to delay for tech companies to act voluntarily.