🔗 Share this article

This is Black History Month in the UK, and it appears it’s time for a rethink. As time has passed, an celebration that was initiated as a festivity and recollection of heritage, traditions and links between global Black communities, has adopted a commercial tone, expanding to include gatherings where Black people are compensated to address white audiences about implicit prejudice and supportive partnership. The 2020s Black Lives Matter protests sparked an increase in the business of displaying cultural sensitivity. However, that period has concluded. The surge has reached its height, resulting in a somewhat empty inheritance of what promoting consciousness is for.

The Origins of Black History Observance

Initially celebrated in the United States and Canada, Black History Month was created in 1962 as a week dedicated to Negro history by African American historian Carter G. Woodson with seven days of commemoration and observance in the second week of February. Black History Month evolved from this campaign and was publicly established in 1970. Now it is celebrated not only in the United States and Canada in February, but also in October in the United Kingdom, Germany, Ireland and the the Kingdom of the Netherlands.

The observance has developed since those days, focusing less on the narratives of transatlantic enslavement and fights for racial justice, and more on notable African descendants in government, the arts, and social movements, and widely honoring the impact Black people have made to shape the country. It is in learning environments where Black History Month is most frequently marked, with discussions and heritage festivities. But the method the observance is commemorated is a indication of the contemporary political context. How it develops is a instructive case in how assimilation leads to erosion: the transformation of Black History Month has hindered the objective of it, which is to address structural and organizational discrimination.

---

A Troubling Time

Few things illustrate how critical it is to rethink Black History Month more than the particular moment in which it falls this year. In the UK, a resurgent right in the form of the Reform political group is leading the polls. In the warmer months we saw the biggest extreme right demonstration in the UK's past. the Conservative leader, the African descendant in charge of the Conservative party, is a strong critic of Black Lives Matter, and we are in a position where a member of parliament feels empowered to declare that “not seeing any white faces” in certain urban areas is a source of worry. Meanwhile, ultra-nationalist movements are surging in Europe as a complete entity.

In the America, a colossal assault against diversity initiatives and positive discrimination has been taken, often successfully, to the top legal institutions of the country. A drive to scrub African American heritage and narrative from the historical documents is in progress. One of the former president's early administrative commands aimed at the National Museum of African American History and Culture, and the prestigious establishment, claiming they of a coordinated and broad attempt to change the national past” by portraying America “as naturally discriminatory”.

Given these circumstances, the month illustrates how little it can be impactful if it is confined to either dutiful corporate observances, or stripped of political content commemorations of historical achievements, rather than addressing the conditions of the current era. It also reveals how its short period means that it is separated from the more extensive continuous action that is required. An academic expert, a professor at a learning establishment, put it best when she voiced worries about the fleeting superficial actions of the observance. “The difficulty with taking a tokenistic approach”, she stated, “is that it often means that Black History Month evolves into a brief show rather than a catalyst for change.”

---

Reconsidering, Not Discarding

Figuring out how to alter, change and broaden actions for racial equality and recognition in such periods of dismay and anxiety is a treacherous thing. There is a urge to just do away with events including Black History Month completely, assuming they are simply not fit for purpose, or are vestiges of an era that has failed to deliver.

However, regardless of the situation, Black History Month, and in fact the complete comprehensive structure and tradition of activism for racial justice – grassroots Black Lives Matter organisations, diversity equity and inclusion initiatives, and yes, even those talks to businesses – constitute an framework that a considerable labor has gone into. It is there not only to deteriorate as the politics moves on (and in fact, declines), but to be a vital organism.

So what would a contemporary active Black History Month seem? To begin with, it would be not just one concentrated month: something that is distributed through the year (as various establishments are already starting to implement), parts of its content (particularly around historic Black characters) integrated into educational programs. It would also be a period that does not shy away from governmental matters, and allows opportunity for individuals, particularly young people, to express their concerns and stories. What use is simple recognition of the past when it doesn’t reckon with the present reality of extreme conservative demonstrations in the urban areas? Organizations who observe it should not be reassured with the neutral terminology of “unconscious bias” and alertness to “microaggressions”, but faced with the risks that face all if anti-racism is not approached earnestly. To summarize, Black History Month should be made up-to-date, urgent, and responsive. Perhaps an total re-identification is required – Present-Day African Heritage Celebration.